A Clinical Research Coordinator carries a 53/100 AI replacement risk (medium). AI can already handle routine documentation and reporting; Judgment in ambiguous situations still needs a person. Of exposed work, ~64% is automation vs 36% augmentation. Capability clock: ~2.0 years (2028). (ReplacedYet AI-Risk Index, 2026 data.)

Will AI replace a Clinical Research Coordinator?

AI replacement risk: 53/100 (medium risk). Moderate exposure — AI automates routine parts; judgment and relationships remain human.

Timeline: 2030–2034. Of the exposed work, roughly 64% is likely to be automated and 36% augmented. $1.1B/yr of US wages sit in highly-exposed work for this role.

AI/software exposure: 65%. Robot/physical-automation exposure: 0%.

Capability clock: AI's measured task horizon reaches this role's core complexity (~262.8h of human work) ~2.0 years (2028) — projected from METR's ~4.3-month doubling.

Pressure Index: 38/100 (low) — blends risk, demand trend, and real-world evidence. Job postings down 8% vs 2020.

AI tools targeting this role

Layoff signal: low — AI accelerates research workflows, but experimental design and interpretation keep demand stable.

Tasks at risk

Tasks that still need a human

Skills that protect you

Safer adjacent careers

Food Scientist (24%) · Biologist (25%) · Microbiologist (26%) · Biochemist (26%)

Related jobs

Economist (52%) · Sociologist (50%) · Political Scientist (50%) · Chemist (29%)

Category: Science · Methodology · Download the dataset

ReplacedYet AI-Risk Index. Last updated 2026-06-26. AI-estimated and directionally useful, not a guarantee.