A Video Editor carries a 44/100 AI replacement risk (medium). AI can already handle rough cuts & assembly; Story & pacing still needs a person. Of exposed work, ~63% is automation vs 37% augmentation. Capability clock: ~2.8 years (2029). (ReplacedYet AI-Risk Index, 2026 data.)

Will AI replace a Video Editor?

AI replacement risk: 44/100 (medium risk). Moderate exposure — AI automates routine parts; judgment and relationships remain human.

Timeline: 2030–2034. Of the exposed work, roughly 63% is likely to be automated and 37% augmented. $2.1B/yr of US wages sit in highly-exposed work for this role.

AI/software exposure: 57%. Robot/physical-automation exposure: 0%.

Capability clock: AI's measured task horizon reaches this role's core complexity (~1276.7h of human work) ~2.8 years (2029) — projected from METR's ~4.3-month doubling.

Pressure Index: 48/100 (medium) — blends risk, demand trend, and real-world evidence. Job postings down 24% vs 2020.

AI tools targeting this role

Layoff signal: moderate — AI editing tools automate routine cutting and assembly, trimming demand for entry-level editing work.

Then vs. now: the 2013 Oxford study scored this 20%; our 2026 index scores it 44% (a rise of 24 points).

Tasks at risk

Tasks that still need a human

Skills that protect you

Safer adjacent careers

Film Director (20%) · Film Producer (30%) · Childcare Worker (5%) · Hairdresser (6%)

Related jobs

Journalist (47%) · Sound Engineer (40%) · Camera Operator (40%) · Broadcast Announcer (39%)

Category: Media · Methodology · Download the dataset

ReplacedYet AI-Risk Index. Last updated 2026-06-26. AI-estimated and directionally useful, not a guarantee.